Skip to main content

As they so amply demonstrate at every available opportunity, the rich are convinced that the rules do not apply to them. (See Trump, Donald, and Andrew, Prince.) Depending on the day, there is no one richer than Elon Musk, and he is no different (although he’d be very keen for laws applying to his enemies to be introduced and strictly enforced).

Today, Musk engaged in a few of his favorite pastimes, whining and playing the victim. Instead of his usual forum, Twitter, this came in the form of a letter written by his lawyer to a court. Seems the 2018 settlement he struck with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allowed him to remain Tesla’s CEO in exchange for having a grown-up monitor his tweeting, isn’t working out as he expected. And when something isn’t working out the way a very rich man expects, he in turn expects someone to do something about it.

Musk and Tesla thought settling the charges would end the agency’s “harassment” of Musk and allow the court, not the agency to monitor his compliance, Musk’s lawyer wrote in a new court filing Thursday. “But the SEC has broken its promises,” he wrote, alleging that the agency has been “weaponizing the consent decree by using it to try to muzzle and harass Mr. Musk and Tesla.”

Given that Musk hasn’t for a moment sought to live up to his promises in that settlement, that’s a pretty rich allegation. But there’s more nonsense legalese that Tesla lawyer Alex Spiro would be embarrassed to put his name to if lawyers like Spiro were capable of such.

“The SEC seems to be targeting Mr. Musk and Tesla for unrelenting investigation largely because Mr. Musk remains an outspoken critic of the government,” Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk and Tesla, said in the new filing, seeking to bring the agency’s 2018 securities case against him to a close. “The SEC’s outsized efforts seem calculated to chill his exercise of First Amendment rights rather than to enforce generally applicable laws in evenhanded fashion.”

I mean, where does one start? With the fact that commercial speech such as that regulated by the SEC doesn’t enjoy full First Amendment protection? With the fact that no other company has had to hire a social-media babysitter for its chief executive to keep him from violating securities law, rendering any question of “evenhanded” comparison moot? With the fact that Musk agreed to the terms of this legal settlement and has brazenly violated it over and over and over again?

Musk says he doesn’t really want to be Tesla’s CEO anymore. If he’d like to be able to tweet whatever he wants about the company without the SEC pointing out that he specifically agreed not to do that, he’s always free to resign.

Tesla CEO Musk accuses SEC of calculated effort to ‘chill’ his right to free speech [CNBC]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.


Elon Musk Smoking

Elon Musk Asks Court To Allow SEC To Force Him Out As Tesla CEO

That’s probably not what he thinks he’s asking for, but it is.

Quit hiding behind the bench. By Phil Roeder (Flickr: Supreme Court of the United States) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court May Get The SEC Off Elon Musk’s Case

Someone else is doing a better job of fighting regulator-mandated speech restrictions than the world’s richest man.

kimbal musk

SEC Legally Allowed To Continue Harassing Elon Musk, Does So

Gary Gensler & co. are upping the ante to “insider trading.”

twitter login

Actually Twitter’s Pretty Happy To Not Be Owned By Elon Musk

If there were any doubt about it, here’s a poison pill the company’s got between its teeth, ready to bite down should Musk place any large orders.


Elon Musk Refuses To Let Brett Kavanaugh Have All The Fun Today

No one comes between Elon and a hot news cycle.


Instead Of Austin, Maybe Elon Musk Should Move To Seoul

What’s the South Korean government’s position on exterminating MBAs?