Skip to main content

You might think losing some $600 million because some back-office person forgot to keep track of how many structured notes you’ve sold and/or some lawyer forgot to file the boilerplate with the Securities and Exchange Commission informing it that you’d be selling some more would be enough to ensure that something like that never happens again. Certainly, a screw-up of similar magnitude at Citigroup seems to have done that trick. But when it comes to Barclays, well, the SEC just not sure. So it has a little reinforcement to remind the Brits not to cross it again.

"While we acknowledge Barclays' efforts to identify, disclose and remediate this conduct, the control deficiencies and the scope of the conduct at issue here was simply staggering," Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said in a statement…. On Thursday, the SEC said Barclays had also agreed to pay a $200 million civil penalty for the control lapses.

Barclays hit by $361 million U.S. penalty for 'staggering' blunder [Reuters via Yahoo!]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

Wells Fargo.Insane

Seven Million Dollar Fines Levied On Wells Fargo Don’t Make Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Sound Sacrosanct

Charlie Scharf is probably not even made aware of penalties under eight figures.

How do you say, "low six-month fix" in emojis? Helar Lukats [CC BY-SA 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons

WhatsApp Is Free… Until It Isn’t

Failing to keep track of the untrackable is proving very expensive for banks.

No, wait! Put it back!

Former Barclays Exec In Hot Water For Being Confused About Words Like "Bribe" And "Butthole"

Richard Boath reportedly calls bribes "bungs," and also doesn't know how bribes work.

ey

SEC Making Some Seriously Ominous Noises About Auditor Independence

If the Big Four didn’t like giving up their Russian affiliates, imagine how they’ll feel about having to give up the consulting businesses.

No, wait! Put it back!

Firing Watch ’22: Barclays Back Office Staff

A bit of incomprehensible stupidity just cost the bank nearly $600 million.

Getty Images

Barclays Execs Knew Nothing Of Woman Claiming To Have Arranged $15B Qatari Capital Infusion—Other Than That She Was A ‘Tart’

Oh, yes, and perhaps had something to do with the sale of Britain’s most successful soccer team? It rings a bit of a bell, now that you ask about it in lawsuit form.