insider-trading

Puneet Diskhit is going up the river.

The SEC is as surprised as you are.

The need for reform of which is apparently the post-presidential project of one Donald J. Trump.

Is a real argument actually made by a published author, even if it is only in Forbes.

Especially when there’s insider-trading allegedly involved.

Unless, you know, he and the less-the-esteemed gentleman from North Carolina did, you know, insider-trade.

At least one company did not enjoy having its shares dumped, it says in lawsuit form.

And also not take away their free ice cream.

Oh, sorry, from Netflix. It’s coming from it.

We’re sure you’ll agree with it that probes into potential insider-trading and whether its CEO should be allowed to be its CEO are nothing to worry about.

Vitaly Korchevsky’s gonna stay a prison paster for a while longer.

Those inclined to do it are not inclined to be dissuaded by a pandemic-induced sense of everyone being in this together.

Certainly more than its doing any iced tea, or blockchain, for that matter. Allegedly.

For something so volatile and theoretically interesting, the not-particularly-trying trials of faux currencies are actually quite boring.

What about selling 99.3% of one’s shares in a company would make you think otherwise?

“Insider trading is part of my investment strategy” is a funny joke only if it’s not. Otherwise, it’s an admission of guilt.

The little regulator that could has 10b5-1 plans, SPACs, Twitter, accounting and chief compliance officers in his sights.

Just a bit, though.