Las Vegas

It's unclear if Gasparino quizzed fellow steam room goer James Carville on how he keeps fit but it seems likely.

You don't see Ms. Wynn prying into what's going on at ISS, do you?

As you may have heard, earlier this week the lovable scamp that is Prince Harry of Wales got in a bit of hot water when he was photographed ass naked in Las Vegas, with a bunch of equally ass naked ladies, following some sort of swim meet with Olympic gold medalist Ryan Lochte. Those photographs, some of which involved a billiards table and pool cues, were subsequently run on the covers of various newspapers and the Queen, being none too pleased, told her grandson to get on the first flight back to London (apparently in a tone so scary he knew she meant business and "did not mingle with other passengers," instead remaining "in the upstairs cabin of the 747" to think about what he'd done). While it's unclear what kind of punishment the Queen has in mind, or if she's yet delivered the sort of tongue lashing generally reserved for naughty Corgis and her subjects at RBS, in the meantime many have come to the prince's defense and advised the old lady to back off, like the hedge fund manager the Times found on the tube who thinks the Queen should relax and have a good laugh about it. She'd be doing the same thing if Prince Philip ever gave her a weekend off. Among people surveyed at random in central London, including subway commuters reading about the Las Vegas incident on the front page of the tabloid the Evening Standard, the verdict was mostly thumbs-up. “I think it’s quite funny,” said John Daniels, 46, a hedge fund manager. “I’m sure most people would like to be doing exactly the same thing, especially in Vegas. This is his own private time and people shouldn’t be taking photographs of him.” For Prince Harry, Vegas Exploits Didn't Stay There [NYT]

What do you do when you’re a mid-20s male that dropped out of college to play online poker for a living, and the government suddenly cuts off your source of income? The answer, it seems, is move to Mexico. That’s right; apparently there is an expatriate community of American online poker professionals that have relocated to Baja California, just across the border from San Diego. A larger group is centered in Cabo San Lucas, which is much nicer but also more expensive and farther from the States. Hundreds of players have made the move and resumed playing on Pokerstars and the smaller European sites. However, right now it is June, and that means poker players live or online are in Las Vegas for the World Series of Poker. I was curious to see the long-term repercussions of the government’s crackdown on internet poker last April. Unsurprisingly, it seems like the live poker industry has contracted. Overall, Americans had $150 million stuck online in the now-defunct Full Tilt Poker, and removing all that cash from the poker economy was bound to hurt the live games. From what I saw, most of the cash games at the Rio were small-stakes No Limit Hold ‘Em or Pot-Limit Omaha. There were a few bigger-stakes mixed games but nothing above $50/$100 limit. As for the WSOP itself, the number of entrants to most events has fallen off dramatically year-over-year. Last year, the first $1,500 no limit tournament had 3,157 entrants; this year it had 2,101. A dealer told me that Harrah’s overestimated the player pool and hired a lot more staff than was necessary. The fabled ‘big game’ with Doyle Brunson et al no longer runs regularly in Las Vegas. Amazingly, the biggest games in the world have now moved to Macau, where the ultra-high-limit players are competing with Chinese businessmen in No Limit games with blinds of HKD$10,000/HKD$20,000($1,300/$2,600). Probably the biggest story from this year’s WSOP was Phil Ivey nearly winning another bracelet. Ivey didn’t play last year’s series due to the Full Tilt debacle, but this year he’s back and five-bet bluffing as usual. First-place money in a preliminary WSOP event has long since ceased to matter to Ivey, as he regularly plays in games with million-dollar swings. However, he’s got huge side bets that pay off if he wins a bracelet. The rumors going around place the odds for these bets at either 2-1 or 3-1, and the amounts are likely in the millions. In other words, if Ivey wins a bracelet, he gets the first-place money, but he also gets several million additional dollars from the side bets. He’s come close twice already – he took 3rd in the $5K Omaha 8 event and 2nd in the $10K pot limit hold ‘em event. In the latter tournament he was defeated in heads-up play by a former Wall Street equity trader. The next big thing at the WSOP is the million-dollar-buyin tournament coming up on July 1st. The event is capped at 48 players, and it seems likely to sell out. Nearly every confirmed entrant so far is a professional poker player, many of whom have likely sold off big pieces of their action. There are a couple of confirmed non-professional players including an “anonymous hedge fund manager.” For the next few years, it doesn’t seem likely that the WSOP will reach the size that it did in 2006, when the number of entrants to the main event peaked at 8,773. The live poker boom of the mid-2000s was always fueled by internet poker. When the major sites were shut down, the WSOP lost a major feeder source of new players. Americans still have $150M in funds locked up on Full Tilt, and it remains doubtful that any of that money will come back. The only hope for a revival for the struggling industry is the legalization of online poker in individual states. In a supremely ironic twist, the Justice Department changed its mind about internet poker last December and cleared the way for regulated intrastate poker. Nevada has already passed legislation and will probably have games up and running within a few months; it seems likely that other states will follow.